Sample shortlist

See how Resume Selector structures resume screening results

This fictional example shows how a recruiting team can review candidates with match notes, strengths, potential gaps, and interview questions before making a human-led hiring decision.

Sample data only. No real candidate information is used on this page.

Start screening resumes Back to homepage

Fictional role

Senior Full Stack Engineer

3 candidates reviewed

Candidate 1

Alex Morgan

Strong match

87%

Alex shows strong full stack SaaS experience, with relevant frontend and backend work across production products.

Candidate 2

Jamie Carter

Good match

78%

Jamie has solid frontend experience and some backend exposure, but may need validation on architecture and ownership depth.

Candidate 3

Sam Lee

Partial match

64%

Sam has relevant engineering experience, but the resume shows weaker alignment with SaaS product ownership and full stack responsibilities.

Role summary

Role

Senior Full Stack Engineer

Hiring context

A small SaaS company is looking for a full stack engineer who can ship product features end-to-end, work across frontend and backend, and communicate technical trade-offs clearly.

Key criteria

React and modern frontend experience

Backend API development

SaaS product experience

Database and system design fundamentals

Clear communication and ownership

Fictional candidate shortlist

Structured notes your hiring team can review

Each profile keeps the evidence visible, highlights what should be validated, and prepares focused interview questions for a human-led review.

Candidate 1

Alex Morgan

Strong match

Score: 87%

Alex shows strong full stack SaaS experience, with relevant frontend and backend work across production products.

Strengths

Strong React and backend experience
Previous SaaS product background
Experience shipping production features end-to-end

Potential gaps

Limited evidence of team leadership
Cloud infrastructure experience should be validated

Interview questions

Can you describe a SaaS feature you shipped from idea to production?
How do you approach trade-offs between speed and maintainability?
What backend responsibilities did you own in your previous roles?

Candidate 2

Jamie Carter

Good match

Score: 78%

Jamie has solid frontend experience and some backend exposure, but may need validation on architecture and ownership depth.

Strengths

Strong frontend implementation background
Good experience with product teams
Clear signs of collaboration with backend engineers

Potential gaps

Backend experience appears less extensive
System design depth needs validation

Interview questions

What backend tasks have you handled directly?
How do you collaborate with backend teams when building product features?
Can you walk through a complex frontend feature you delivered?

Candidate 3

Sam Lee

Partial match

Score: 64%

Sam has relevant engineering experience, but the resume shows weaker alignment with SaaS product ownership and full stack responsibilities.

Strengths

General software engineering experience
Some exposure to web application development
Potential for growth in a product-focused team

Potential gaps

Limited SaaS product experience
Full stack ownership is unclear
Interview should validate practical React and API experience

Interview questions

Which parts of the stack have you owned independently?
Can you describe your experience with React and backend APIs?
What kind of product environment helps you perform best?

Recruiter review

What your team can review

Resume Selector does not make hiring decisions. It gives recruiters and hiring managers a structured review format so they can compare candidates more consistently.

Candidate ranking

Quickly see which candidates appear closest to the role criteria.

Strengths and gaps

Review where each candidate seems aligned and what needs validation.

Interview questions

Prepare focused questions based on the candidate profile and role requirements.

Human review

Keep the final decision in the hands of your hiring team.

Not an ATS. A screening layer before the shortlist.

Resume Selector is not designed to replace your ATS or recruiting workflow. It focuses on the first screening step: turning a batch of resumes into structured candidate notes your team can review before moving candidates forward.

Use it before your ATS workflow
Use it alongside manual resume review
Use it when you need a structured first pass
Keep recruiters in control of every decision

AI-assisted screening. Human-led hiring.

Resume Selector is designed to support recruiters, HR teams, and hiring managers. It helps structure resume screening and interview preparation, but it does not automatically reject candidates or make final hiring decisions.

No automatic candidate rejection
No black-box hiring decisions
Structured notes for recruiter review
Final decisions stay with your team

Ready to review your first shortlist?

Start with one role, upload a small batch of resumes, and review structured candidate insights at your own pace.

Start screening resumes Back to homepage

Sample shortlist

See how Resume Selector structures resume screening results

This fictional example shows how a recruiting team can review candidates with match notes, strengths, potential gaps, and interview questions before making a human-led hiring decision.

Sample data only. No real candidate information is used on this page.

Start screening resumes Back to homepage

Fictional role

Senior Full Stack Engineer

3 candidates reviewed

Candidate 1

Alex Morgan

Strong match

87%

Alex shows strong full stack SaaS experience, with relevant frontend and backend work across production products.

Candidate 2

Jamie Carter

Good match

78%

Jamie has solid frontend experience and some backend exposure, but may need validation on architecture and ownership depth.

Candidate 3

Sam Lee

Partial match

64%

Sam has relevant engineering experience, but the resume shows weaker alignment with SaaS product ownership and full stack responsibilities.

Role summary

Role

Senior Full Stack Engineer

Hiring context

A small SaaS company is looking for a full stack engineer who can ship product features end-to-end, work across frontend and backend, and communicate technical trade-offs clearly.

Key criteria

React and modern frontend experience

Backend API development

SaaS product experience

Database and system design fundamentals

Clear communication and ownership

Fictional candidate shortlist

Structured notes your hiring team can review

Each profile keeps the evidence visible, highlights what should be validated, and prepares focused interview questions for a human-led review.

Candidate 1

Alex Morgan

Strong match

Score: 87%

Alex shows strong full stack SaaS experience, with relevant frontend and backend work across production products.

Strengths

Strong React and backend experience
Previous SaaS product background
Experience shipping production features end-to-end

Potential gaps

Limited evidence of team leadership
Cloud infrastructure experience should be validated

Interview questions

Can you describe a SaaS feature you shipped from idea to production?
How do you approach trade-offs between speed and maintainability?
What backend responsibilities did you own in your previous roles?

Candidate 2

Jamie Carter

Good match

Score: 78%

Jamie has solid frontend experience and some backend exposure, but may need validation on architecture and ownership depth.

Strengths

Strong frontend implementation background
Good experience with product teams
Clear signs of collaboration with backend engineers

Potential gaps

Backend experience appears less extensive
System design depth needs validation

Interview questions

What backend tasks have you handled directly?
How do you collaborate with backend teams when building product features?
Can you walk through a complex frontend feature you delivered?

Candidate 3

Sam Lee

Partial match

Score: 64%

Sam has relevant engineering experience, but the resume shows weaker alignment with SaaS product ownership and full stack responsibilities.

Strengths

General software engineering experience
Some exposure to web application development
Potential for growth in a product-focused team

Potential gaps

Limited SaaS product experience
Full stack ownership is unclear
Interview should validate practical React and API experience

Interview questions

Which parts of the stack have you owned independently?
Can you describe your experience with React and backend APIs?
What kind of product environment helps you perform best?

Recruiter review

What your team can review

Resume Selector does not make hiring decisions. It gives recruiters and hiring managers a structured review format so they can compare candidates more consistently.

Candidate ranking

Quickly see which candidates appear closest to the role criteria.

Strengths and gaps

Review where each candidate seems aligned and what needs validation.

Interview questions

Prepare focused questions based on the candidate profile and role requirements.

Human review

Keep the final decision in the hands of your hiring team.

Not an ATS. A screening layer before the shortlist.

Use it before your ATS workflow
Use it alongside manual resume review
Use it when you need a structured first pass
Keep recruiters in control of every decision

AI-assisted screening. Human-led hiring.

No automatic candidate rejection
No black-box hiring decisions
Structured notes for recruiter review
Final decisions stay with your team

Ready to review your first shortlist?

Start with one role, upload a small batch of resumes, and review structured candidate insights at your own pace.

Start screening resumes Back to homepage